Thursday, December 13, 2012

2013 Analysis, Research, and Technology Forum at TRB

You are invited to attend a forum presented by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration's Office of Analysis, Research, and Technology (ART) on Tuesday, January 15, 2013, at the 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (TRB) from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. in Salon 3 at the Marriott Wardman Park Hotel, 2660 Woodley Road, NW, Washington, DC 20008.
The overall 2013 forum program will address FMCSA's safety-first mission and the impact that analysis, research, and technology have on its success in two back-to-back sessions. The first session will present a broad overview of FMCSA's top Agency priorities and the second will provide updates on current analysis, research, and technology initiatives which support FMCSA's safety objectives.
Topics to be presented and discussed include:
  • Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) Data, Research, and Safety Performance
  • Compliance, Safety, Accountability (CSA) and the Motorcoach Safety Action Plan
  • Utilizing FMCSA Safety Data
  • Safetydata.gov
  • Application Programming Interfaces: The Data Behind SaferBus
  • Data User Examples
  • Safety Impact of the Pre-Employment Screening Program Findings from Roadside Inspections Future FMCSA Safety Research Activities (Large Truck Crash Study, Electronic Logging Devices, Driver Fatigue).
If you plan to attend the forum or other sessions of the TRB Annual Meeting, you must register and pay a registration fee. To register for the TRB Annual Meeting, visit www.trb.org.
Mark your calendars for Tuesday, January 15, and we will see you there!

Survey: Speed Reduction, Driver Training, Progressive Shifting Give Best Fuel Efficiency Payback - Truckinginfo.com

Survey: Speed Reduction, Driver Training, Progressive Shifting Give Best Fuel Efficiency Payback - Truckinginfo.com

FMCSA Activates 11 Changes to CSA, Including Hazmat Compliance Proposal

By Eric Miller, Staff Reporter
This story appears in the Dec. 10 print edition of Transport Topics.
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration said last week it activated previously announced changes to its Compliance, Safety, Accountability program, including the adoption of a controversial proposal to step up hazardous materials compliance, and the elimination of a perceived enforcement bias against flatbed carriers.
FMCSA Administrator Anne Ferro said during a Dec. 3 conference call the agency implemented 11 CSA changes, including the creation of a stand-alone hazardous materials compliance category and moving cargo-securement violations into the vehicle maintenance category.

The changes, initially made available to carriers in August, include changes to two Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Categories the agency uses to monitor carrier performance. FMCSA also renamed another BASIC.
The CSA program uses roadside violation inspection and crash data to help FMCSA identify unsafe or high-risk motor carriers.

FMCSA said when it first unveiled the tweaks in August they would only cause “modest” changes to the program’s Safety Measurement System carrier percentile scores but would “sharpen our focus on the carriers that need our focus.”

But the new hazmat category has been controversial among motor carriers that are not primarily hazmat haulers. Some of those carriers have said a preview of the new BASIC showed their scores would significantly worsen.
However, carrier scores in the new hazmat category will not be available to the public for an undetermined period.
Some in trucking also have said the cargo-securement violations would be de-emphasized because they would get lost in the vehicle maintenance category.

Other modifications that went live last week include changing the name of the Fatigued Driving BASIC to the Hours-of-Service Compliance BASIC, removing 1-to-5 mph speeding violations from carrier and driver safety scores, and assigning the same CSA severity weights to paper logs and electronic logging device violations.
The changes also included eliminating vehicle violations derived from driver-only inspections, and driver violations from vehicle-only inspections, Ferro said.

The changes went public on Dec. 3 as an early update to FMCSA’s monthly update of carriers’ SMS scores. The agency generally updates the scores around the 21st of each month, but chose to update the December scores early using the CSA changes.

Ferro said that after six years of research and stakeholder input, the CSA program has been “a very effective program and a positive change for safety.”

In 2011, roadside inspection-related violations were down 8%, and driver violations for inspections decreased 10%, Ferro said.

“These two figures represent the most dramatic decrease in violation rates in a decade,” Ferro said.
But in a white paper issued Dec. 5, American Trucking Associations said the CSA measurement system lacks sufficient data to render meaningful scores for most carriers.

The white paper pointed to recent research by the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute that confirmed that commercial motor vehicle crash underreporting by state agencies has long plagued FMCSA’s ability to accurately measure motor carrier safety performance.

“Indeed, in 37 evaluations of 35 states, UMTRI found reporting rates ranging from under 10% of reportable crashes to over 80%,” the white paper said. “This wide disparity undoubtedly creates vast discrepancies between the safety measurements of carriers with similar crash performance operating in different states.”
FMCSA said it has sufficient violation data to assess 40% of active carriers in at least one safety rating category but only enough to “assign a percentile rank or score” in at least one category to 12% of active carriers, ATA said.

But ATA said the vast majority of these carriers are assigned a score in only one category. The agency contends this weakness is not problematic because “those carriers are involved in 83% of the crashes.”
“This statement concerns us since FMCSA doesn’t really know how many commercial motor vehicle crashes are occurring or who is involved in them,” said ATA President Bill Graves. “Many crashes simply don’t get reported to the agency,” he said.

Dave Osiecki, senior vice president of policy and regulatory affairs for ATA, said the federation appreciates the agency listening to industry and making the changes.

“Clearly, CSA remains a work in progress, though,” Osiecki said. “In some cases, the recent changes were made with little or no underlying crash risk analyses. The Hazmat Compliance BASIC is a good example.”

However, Ferro dismissed concerns over recent research by the American Transportation Research Institute that concluded at least two of the BASICs don’t directly relate to crash risk.

“Compliance and accountability together yield the strongest safety benefits,” Ferro said. “It’s absolutely accurate that all of these BASICs identify noncompliance, or focus on compliance. Several of the BASICs have a much higher correlation to crash risk.”

Court Sets March 15 Date for Hours Of Service Arguments

American Trucking Associations will argue its case against the hours-of-service rule for truck drivers on March 15 before a federal appeals court in Washington.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said Wednesday it will hear arguments from ATA against the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s HOS rule, which the agency issued last December.

The HOS rule, set to take place in July 2013, mandates that truck drivers can only use the 34-hour restart to reset their weekly driving limits once every seven days, and the restart time must include two periods between 1 a.m. and 5 a.m. It also requires that drivers take a half-hour rest break before driving more than eight hours in a day.

ATA sought to overturn the rule with its lawsuit, claiming that the cost-benefit analysis FMCSA used to justify the rule was flawed and overstated the prevalence of truck driver fatigue.

Public Citizen, along with other interest groups, also sued to overturn the rule, though they sought a rule that further restricts driver hours. Their lawsuit was combined with ATA’s, so they will also present oral arguments on March 15. 

By Timothy Cama
Transport Topics Staff Reporter

Monday, December 10, 2012

Seven Steps to Effective Decisions

Various military branches have guidelines for complex operations in stressful environments - which I have adapted to transportation operations.  The last two months of the year are critical for most transportation operations.  Most of our clients are running at capacity, weather is changing, and everyone wants to go on vacation at the same time.  
How do you make effective decisions in your operations?  Let me know your thoughts and ideas.  Below are 7 components to consider for your fleet operations:
1.  Analysis.  Conduct an assessment.  Each job, each load is different. 
How critical is it for that load, that postal trip, or that drilling rig to be on site, on time?  You’ve assigned people - how capable are they for this particular job?  What is the risk of weather?   
Develop contingency plans for problems that may arise.
Conduct another assessment when the situation changes.
2.  Situational Awareness.  To make good decisions, we must know what’s going on around us.  Plans are critical to success, but we must be ready to change those plans when the situation changes.   
Some examples; you have planned a lengthy postal run with 5 driver changes each way.  What are your plans if weather forces the third driver to shut down for 12 hours?  You have 6 people and 3 vehicles servicing an oilwell - what happens to that next scheduled job if the crew gets snowed in for a day? 
Complacency and boredom inhibit our situational awareness, causing us to become lazy, stop monitoring, and not create contingency plans.  
Highly stressful situations cause us to hyper focus - in the truck and in the office.  This extraordinary focus causes us to lose sight of what’s going on around us - and to disregard some good advice.  
Maintaining an awareness of our environment helps us to catch those little mistakes before they become big errors.  
3.  Adaptability.  With proper situational awareness, we are able to detect and respond to changes cause by driver failures, equipment failures, changing customer demands, or weather events.  
Are we flexible, and ready to listen to differing opinions?  Do we think we have all the answers, or do we listen to those who may be closer to the situation than we are?  
4.  Communication.  Clear communication is ensuring that people have a clear understanding of what we wish to convey.  It is the sender’s responsibility to make sure communications are received and understood.
However, good communications involves a feedback loop - asking for feedback, monitoring behavior, or watching key performance indicators to make certain the message was received.  In this two-way communications environment created when you ask for feedback, both parties are responsible for the message is received, understood, and effective.
5.  Leadership.  Leaders find a way to accomplish the goal.  Leadership is not about giving orders.  Leadership is not about your position.  Anyone can be a leader - we all have that opportunity.  Through hard work and example, leaders achieve the respect, confidence, collaboration, and loyalty of those we work with.  
6.  Assertiveness.  Assertive people care more about the goal, mission, or job.  Aggressive people are motivated by ego or self-image.
Assertiveness is about communicating concerns and striving for a reasonable resolution.  
7.  Decision Making.  When we lay the foundation as described in the first 6 steps - we have the information and ability to make good decisions.  Some decisions take 20 seconds, and some take 20 months.  The process remains the same. 

Friday, December 7, 2012

Staying Safe in Adverse Weather



It's that time of year when we all face increased hazards caused by weather.  In addition, many of our clients are in their peak season.  Now is the time many of you are operating at full capacity, in the middle of the worst weather of the year. 

Some proven, basic rules for safe driving in winter weather:
  1. Make sure drivers are prepared.  Mentally prepared, alert and awake.  Physically prepared, dressed for the weather and rested.  Make sure that the truck is stocked with some food and water, as well as cold weather clothing and gear.  

  1. Make sure your vehicles are prepared.  Tires lose pressure in cold weather.  If chains are required, make sure they are carried.  Batteries fail in cold weather - test them now.  Make sure heaters work and ducts are not blocked.  Landing gears on your trailers are often overlooked - it's not fun cranking a stiff landing gear in cold weather at 2 AM. 

  1. Fuel - never let trucks run low in the winter. 

  1. Make sure your drivers watch their mirrors for wet roads that suddenly stop throwing spray - that water just turned to ice.  With a keen ear, drivers can tell by tire noise on the pavement when roads start to freeze over.  

  1. In reduced traction conditions, every movement should be slow, well planned, and deliberate.  Braking, acceleration, gear changes, steering - all should be very smooth and slow.   

  1. Watch the other guy - people do the craziest things around big trucks.  Always assume the worst from the other driver - and then you can be pleasantly surprised when it does not happen.  

Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Opinion: FMCSA Must Move Forward on E-Logging Rule

By Bill Graves
President and CEO
American Trucking Associations

This Opinion piece appears in the Dec. 3 print edition of Transport Topics. 

With the dust settling from last month’s elections — and the voters returning to Washington a still-divided government — it is going to be incumbent upon our leaders to find areas of broad agreement to build upon if we are going to move forward as a nation.

While we’ll hear a lot about taxes and spending and a “fiscal cliff” — all important matters, to be sure — we shouldn’t lose sight of smaller but no less important issues. One such issue where the federal government could step up is in the area of highway safety and, specifically, electronic logging.
This summer, a strange and varied coalition came together to press Congress to require that trucks be outfitted with this potentially game-changing technology.

ATA, with support from the commercial motor vehicle enforcement community, the National Transportation Safety Board, AAA, the Teamsters, the Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, along with other, smaller, industry groups, were successful in getting a mandate written into the highway bill.
Getting this provision into such an important piece of legislation was a great victory, and one that I and other safety leaders in Washington are quite proud of. However, the victory is a hollow one until the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration follows the law and does what Congress has tasked it to do.
There are certainly issues to be resolved in getting to a final regulation requiring these devices. For example, as a community we need to determine the best ways to share data from the device to the law enforcement community for oversight purposes. We also need to work through other technical issues outlined in the new law.
Compared with Superstorm Sandy and fiscal-cliff concerns, however, these are easy.


To be sure, there will be a group or two that will push back and attempt to postpone or delay progress on this issue. At least one of these groups will attempt to speak for drivers. However, we know what the driver-related data tell us. The American Transportation Research Institute research tells us that 76% of fleets saw an improvement in driver morale after transitioning to electronic logging, and 19% found it was easier to recruit and retain drivers after making the switch.

We also know from existing fleets that have voluntarily adopted electronic logging that drivers, along with operations personnel, plan better. And, once over a short electronic logging learning curve, drivers never want to return to paper.

The safety benefits of these devices should be plain: compliance with the hours-of-service rules leads to lower crash risk. The data from Compliance, Safety, Accountability tell us so, just as the carriers that have voluntarily adopted electronic logging have told us that their violation rates have declined once they made the switch.

Electronic logs improve safety by making compliance with the rules easier, and further, I’d argue that fighting the use of this technology is an endorsement of providing drivers the opportunity to fudge on their logs. In fact, I’d go so far as to say it is an endorsement of the cheating itself . . . not the biggest problem the industry has, but certainly one that exists.

There are those who fear the mandating of electronic logs because it will take away what they feel is a competitive advantage — namely the ability to drive longer than is allowed and perhaps longer than is safe.

Also obvious are the efficiency benefits to carriers and to drivers. Less time spent filling out, checking, rechecking, verifying, storing and retrieving paper logbooks is time that can be spent doing other things. Moving hours-of-service monitoring into the 21st century will help fleets and drivers plan trips better — reducing wasted time and fuel — and will take the tedious burden of paperwork out of the hands of the driver.

FMCSA has had its marching orders from Congress on this issue for nearly three months — and has previously expressed a desire to issue a rule for well longer than that. It is time — indeed, it is past time — for the agency to put forward a rule and to move our industry and our highways into a safer and more efficient future. Change is hard, but years from now we will look back in reflection and comment that this change was necessary.

Bill Graves is a former two-term governor of Kansas. American Trucking Associations, Arlington, Va., is a national trade federation with affiliated associations in every state. ATA owns Transport Topics Publishing Group.

FMCSA Implements CSA Improvements - Truckinginfo.com

FMCSA Implements CSA Improvements - Truckinginfo.com

FMCSA Advisory Panel Takes on Driver Training - Truckinginfo.com

FMCSA Advisory Panel Takes on Driver Training - Truckinginfo.com

Saturday, December 1, 2012

ATRI Updates Operational Costs Report



The American Transportation Research Institute’s An Analysis of the Operational Costs of Trucking 2012 update cites research showing the average marginal trucking cost per mile for 2011 was $1.71. 

The research identifies fleet-generated marginal costs from 2008 to 2011 and provides carriers with an important high-level benchmarking tool. The 2011 cost is the highest of the four years studied.  Following a sharp decline in fuel prices and the resulting decreased industry costs in 2008 and 2009, marginal costs have steadily risen through 2010 and 2011. 

The per-mile costs were converted to hourly figures using an empirical truck operating speed. The total average industry cost per hour was $68.20 in 2011. Fuel and driver wages continue to be the largest cost centers for carrier, constituting 62% of the average operating cost in 2011. 

The Operational Costs of Trucking report is available online at www.ATRI-online.org.