Q: What was the Court's decision?
A: The Court denied ATA's request that it vacate the restrictions
on use of the 34-hour restart provision that went into effect on July 1 of this
year. However, the Court did rule favorably on ATA's request that it vacate the
rest break requirements for "short-haul" drivers. The Court accepted
ATA's arguments that the differences between long-haul drivers and short-haul
drivers was such that applying the rest break requirement made no sense -
particularly given FMCSA's failure to attempt a justification during the
rulemaking.
Q: When does the Court's decision take
effect?
A: The parties in the case have 45 days in which to challenge the Court's ruling. Assuming no party seeks a rehearing, the Court's decision should take effect after this "challenge window" closes, on September 9th. Until that time, motor carriers must comply with all elements of the current hours of service regulations.
A: The parties in the case have 45 days in which to challenge the Court's ruling. Assuming no party seeks a rehearing, the Court's decision should take effect after this "challenge window" closes, on September 9th. Until that time, motor carriers must comply with all elements of the current hours of service regulations.
Q: What is a "short-haul"
driver?
A: A short haul driver is one who meets the conditions to qualify for a record of duty status (log) exemption in 395.1 (e) (but see next Q&A). These include two groups of drivers:
A: A short haul driver is one who meets the conditions to qualify for a record of duty status (log) exemption in 395.1 (e) (but see next Q&A). These include two groups of drivers:
Those who operate exclusively within a 100 air mile radius of
their normal work reporting location and report to and are released from the
same location daily within 12 consecutive hours of reporting for duty;
and Non-CDL holders who operate exclusively within a 150 air-mile radius of the
work reporting location.
Q: Are both types of short haul drivers
impacted by the Court's decision?
A: Technically speaking, the Court's decision only speaks
specifically to non-CDL holders who operate within a 150 air mile radius.
However, the Court also pointed out the distinction between short haul and long
haul drivers generally, and how the intent of FMCSA's changes to the hours of
service rules was to address the latter. Consistent with the Court's rationale,
ATA believes both types of short haul drivers were intended to be exempted from
the rest break requirement. ATA will seek clarification from FMCSA before the Court's
decision takes effect.
Q: Will ATA or other parties to the case
challenge the court's ruling?
A: It is unlikely that ATA or other parties to the case will
challenge the court's ruling.
Q: Where can I get a copy of the Court's
ruling?
A:
A copy can be downloaded from ATA's website here.
No comments:
Post a Comment